To a disciple who was forever complaining about others the master said, " If it is peace you want, seek to change yourself, not other people. It is easier to protect your feet with slippers than to carpet the whole of the earth.
- Anthony De Mello, SJ.
(Forwarded by Ann Joseph)
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
ഒരു മരണവീട്ടിലെ സംഭാഷണത്തില്‍ നിന്ന്
ചോദ്യം: ചേട്ടത്തിയുടെ മക്കളൊക്കെ അമേരിക്കയില് നിന്ന് എത്തിയോ?.
ഉത്തരം: ഇല്ല, ആരും വരില്ലെന്ന് അറിയിച്ചിട്ടുണ്ട്.
ചോദ്യം: പിന്നെയാരാ അടുത്തിരുന്ന് കരയുന്ന സ്ത്രീകളൊക്കെ?.
ഉത്തരം: അത് 'ഓള്‍വേയ്സ്' ഇവന്‍റ് മാനേജ്മെന്‍റ് കമ്പിനയുടെ സ്റ്റാഫാണ്. ഈ പ്രോഗ്രാം ഞങ്ങളാണ് നടത്തുന്നത് .
ചോദ്യം: പ്രോഗ്രാമോ?
ഉത്തരം: അതെ സര്‍. വിവാഹവും മരണവുമടക്കം ആളുകുടുന്ന എല്ലാ ചടങ്ങും ങ്ങങ്ങള്‍ക്ക് പ്രോഗ്രാമാണ്. പ്രോഗ്രാം കളര്‍ഫുള്ളാക്കാന്‍ എത്രപേരെ വേണമെകകിലും ഇറക്കാന്‍ ഞങ്ങള്‍ക്ക് കഴിയും. ഇവിടെ ഇപ്പോള്‍ ന്നുറുപേരെ ഇറക്കിയിട്ടുണ്ട്.
ചോദ്യം: ആരാണ് നിങ്ങളെ ഇത് ഏല്‍പ്പിച്ചത്?.
ഉത്തരം: അവരുടെ മക്കളാണ് സര്‍. അമേരിക്കയില് നിന്ന് ഇന്റര്‍നെറ്റ്‌ വഴി കഴിഞ്ഞ വര്‍ഷമാണ്‌ അവര് ഞങ്ങളുടെ സേവനത്തിനു രജിസ്റ്റര്‍ ചെയ്തത്.
ചോദ്യം: കഴിഞ്ഞ വര്‍ഷം അതിനു ചേട്ടത്തിക്കു അസുഖമൊന്നും ഉണ്ടായിരുന്നില്ലലോ?.
ഉത്തരം: ഉണ്ടാവണമെന്നില്ല സര്‍. അറുപതു (60 ) വയസ്സ് കഴിഞ്ഞവരെയൊക്കെ നേരത്തേ ബുക്ക്‌ ചെയ്യുന്നതാണ് നല്ലത്. ഇതിപ്പോ ഞങ്ങള്‍ക്ക് നന്നായി ഓര്‍ഗനൈസ് ചെയാനുള്ള സമയം കിട്ടി.
ചോദ്യം: എന്തൊക്കെയാണ് നിങ്ങള് ചെയുന്നത്?.
ഉത്തരം: മരണവിവരം അറിഞ്ഞയുടെന്‍ തന്നെ ഞങ്ങള് മൊബയില് മോര്‍ച്ചറി എത്തിച്ചു. അതുപോലെ മരണവിവരം അറിയിക്കാന്‍ അന്‍പതോളം ഫ്ലെക്സ് ബോര്‍ഡുകള്‍ നാട്ടിലെങ്ങും സ്ഥാപിച്ചു. പിന്നെ പന്തല് ,വീഡിയോകവറേജ്, ഫോട്ടോ, മൈക്ക്, കരയാനും മറ്റുമുള്ള ആളുകള് ഇതൊക്കെ ഞങള്‍ ഏര്‍പ്പാട് ചെയ്യുന്നതാണ്. ഒറ്റയ്ക്ക് താമസിക്കുന്ന ഒരു വ്രിദ്ധ മരിക്കുമ്പോള് സാധാരണ ഗതിയില് ഇത്രയും സൌകര്യങ്ങള് ചിന്തിക്കാന്‍ കഴിയുമോ സര്‍.
ചോദ്യം: അവരുടെ ഭാഗ്യം. ആട്ടെ ഇനിയെന്താ അടുത്ത പരിപാടി?.
ഉത്തരം: വിലാപയത്രയാണ് സര്‍. ന്നൂറോളം കാറുകള് ഏര്‍പ്പാട് ചെയ്തിട്ടുണ്ട്.
ചോദ്യം: ഇതിനൊക്കെ വലിയ തുക ഫീസ്‌ വരില്ലേ?.
ഉത്തരം: തുച്ചം സര്‍. മൂന്നു പെണ്മക്കളും അവരുടെ ഫാമിലി മെമ്പേഴ്സും അമേരിക്കയില് നിന്ന് വന്നിട്ട്‌ പോവാന്‍ കാശെത്രയാവും. അതിന്‍റെ നാലിലൊന്നുപോലും ഞങ്ങളുടെ ഫീസ്‌ വരില്ല. പിന്നെ കഷ്ടപ്പാടുമില്ല. ഇന്‍റെര്‍നെറ്റ്വഴി ഈ പ്രോഗ്രാം അമേരിക്കയിലിരുന്നു കാണുകയുംചെയ്യാം സര്‍.
ചോദ്യം: നന്നായി. ചേട്ടത്തി തലച്ചുറ്റി വീണു മരിച്ചപോള്‍ തന്നെ നിങള്‍ എങ്ങനെ വിവരമറിഞ്ഞു?.
ഉത്തരം: അതാണ് സര്‍ ഞങ്ങളുടെ സര്‍വീസ്. രജിസ്റ്റര്‍ ചെയ്തതൂമുതല് ഈ വീട് ഞങ്ങളുടെ നിരിക്ഷണത്തിലാണ്. ഇവിടെ ഒരീച്ച അനങ്ങിയാല്‍ പ്പോലും ഞങള്‍ക്ക് വിവരം ലഭിക്കും.
ചോദ്യം: അപ്പോള് ച്ചേട്ടത്തിയുടെ മരണത്തിനായി നിങ്ങള് ഒരു വര്‍ഷമായീ കാത്തിരിക്കുകയാന്നെന്നോ?.
ഉത്തരം: സംശയമെന്ത് സര്‍. ചേട്ടത്തിയെ മാത്രംമല്ല, കമ്പിനിയില് രജിസ്റ്റര്‍ ചെയ്തിട്ടുള്ള ന്നൂറൂകണക്കിനലുകളെ അവര് പോലുമറിയാതെ ഞങ്ങള് നീ രീ ക്ഷി ച്ചു കൊണ്ടിരിക്കുകയാണ്. ( 60 കഴിഞ്ഞ ചോദ്യകര്‍ത്താവ് പിന്നീടൊന്നും ഉരിയാടാതെ സംഭ്രമിച്ച് നാലുചുറ്റും നോക്കിക്കൊണ്ട് സ്ഥലം വിട്ടു )
കടപ്പാട്: ഇത് എഴുതിയ ആള്‍ക്ക്......
ഉറവിടം: സത്യം എനിക്കറിയില്ല .
(News forwarded by jose pinto stephen)
Thursday, February 11, 2010
The Anand John CASE: APPEAL FOR FREEDOM
Background RELEASE 02
Project Runaway Juror: The Reality Show of the Anand Jon Case.
May 29, 2009 - Los Angeles
The drama of the Anand Jon case was on maximum overdrive as rogue juror Alvin Dymally took the stand. Dymally has been accused of juror misconduct during the trial that would lead to a new trial for the young fashion designer.
In yet another dramatic plot twist to the trial reminiscent of M. Night Shyamalan movies, “a bombshell was dropped Friday by [the defense] presenting an audio tape they say proves a juror spoke with their client's sister during trial, contradicting the juror's sworn testimony given hours earlier.” (AP / Greg Risling) “[Defense attorney Leonard] Levine said he had never been involved in a case with so many twists and turns.”
The hearing Friday brought to light the seriousness of the allegations. Dymally seemed to be playing a game as he testified. He neither fully denied nor really accepted the serious juror misconduct allegations.
“Let me put it this way…I don’t fully remember” was all the juror kept repeating like a broken record. He would go on major tangents elaborating on even the simplest “yes” or “no” response but committing to nothing fully.
Defense attorney Leonard Levine spent 5 grueling hours deciphering Dymally’s studied “rambling”, stripping away his lies under oath with past inconsistent statements. “I know I didn’t have a conversation with her,” Dymally adamantly testified. (AP)
The wait was well worth it as Dymally’s perjury and major inconsistencies left huge holes in his own stories. Finally he had no choice to concede that he had, in fact, initiated the communication with the Anand Jon’s sister, Sanjana.
The shocked courtroom erupted when a surprise taped communication was revealed. Dymally was left speechless and his lawyer repeatedly requested a recess insisting that his client Dymally answer no further questions. The tape, played in court minutes after Dymally had just denied under oath any such communications with Sanjana during the trial, revealed Dymally speaking with Sanjana.
The quality could have been much better, however, Dymally’s non-stop chatter and accent was distinctly obvious. Dymally talked away for 90% of the 4 ½ minute conversation. Sanjana just kept repeating “thank you.” And “thank you very much.” Profusely thanking a juror would not happen after a guilty verdict, which supports Sanjana’s story and clearly contradicts the juror’s.
The tape starts out simple, but powerful: “Um, I got this number in the cafeteria?”
Then the confirmation from the juror: “Oh, yes, hi. How are you?”
Sanjana’s answer is delayed, scared and shaky: “OK. Um, how are you?”
In the sing-song-y cadence of the juror: “I’m doing all right. I’m doing all right?”
In addition, the facts presented at the hearing are undeniable - the subpoenaed phone records for October 27th and November 3rd corroborated the phone calls between the two occurring during the trial, which concluded November 13, 2008. The defense also contends that the length of the taped phone call equals the first call shown on the phone records.
It was also revealed that there was mysterious contact between the DA investigators and Dymally meeting and speaking on the phone more often than the police reports indicate. Was and is Dymally being coached? Although they are supposed to be independent Dymally’s attorney, Pierpont Laidley, was discussing strategy with the prosecution during the hearing.
This mistrial hearing now supports the last hearing that focused on the recusal of the prosecution. The prosecution intentionally thwarted a defense undercover operation; that operation may have eliminated any doubt regarding this juror’s intentions.
There were several misconduct hearings that put the prosecution on the stand and under a microscope. During those hearings the prosecution team each told different stories amounting to someone, if not everyone, was committing perjury. Surprisingly, they got away with it even though Judge Wesley was “troubled by the interception of the juror” (LA Times / Jack Leonard) “…but the remedy”, stated by the judge in court, “will be in the mistrial hearing.”
Also during those hearings the prosecution tried to take the spotlight off of themselves and their misconduct by sidetracking the court with a collection of images of the accusers. As it turns out these images (most of which were available online) were collected by one of the witnesses in a desperate attempt to make everyone and anyone take notice of the racy character of these girls involved in the trial.
This witness, Lauren Boyette, testified as to the role of her old roommate, Holly G, as a ring leader and conspirator in soliciting, pressuring and instigating these girls to file false allegations against Anand Jon. Lauren testified that she and many of the girls that came into the apartment to meet with Holly (as well as those that Holly spoke to on the phone) were promised fame and money for their participation in the conviction. The carrot dangling was her involvement in a TV reality show that Holly is producing and actively shopping around Hollywood.
Holly’s “sugar daddy”, Sal, was also exposed as the money behind the TV project. They met on a website appropriately named “sugardaddyforme.com” (http://www.sugardaddyforme.com/index.php?page=profile&id=263286). Holly G was also exposed as an escort /prostitute trying to establish a “service” using these same girls.
Boyette testified that prosecutor’s lead detective George Elwell offered “deals” to the girls in order to get them to testify against Anand Jon. Referenced was Holly G’s and Lauren Boyette’s arrest and conviction together in Virginia that would be “wiped away”. Boyette continued that she chatted online with Holly G. It was admitted during the chats that Holly committed perjury during the trial with the knowledge of the prosecution. These newly discovered chats were turned over to the court.
Boyette concluded her revealing testimony by stating that she was intimidated by the prosecution not to testify – surprisingly just outside the courtroom. She testified that DDA Young and two burly DA investigators cornered her in the hallway filled with people, including many attorneys. Their hands were on their weapons and Young said “if you testify you will regret it”. Boyette hasn’t been seen in court since this intimidation.
It was revealed that Holly G was a roommate of Anand Jon and admitted to disappearing with Jessie B for 2 ½ hours convincing her to press charges against Anand Jon. Upon their return she suddenly she claimed their relationship was strictly professional, in sharp contrast to the personal “Hi Babe. Miss you. Can’t wait to see you!” email that anticipated her visit and that the consensual sexual contact was forced.
The timing of these charges is suspect as Anand Jon’s Wall Street financing for his jeans line was just kicking in.
“Almost all of these charges were initially rejected and the allegations in the other jurisdictions are simply frivolous with little merit” stated attorney Saji Vettiyil, who worked on the Youngblood case where an innocent man was wrongfully convicted and years later was overturned. Unfortunately Youngblood died in prison before he was exonerated.
In fact, the NY prosecution told the defense that on its own they would not have filed even a single charge. It was simply due to pressure from LA prosecution and their package of seemingly similar charges.
For additional information regarding the Anand Jon case see www.supportanandjon.org or contact Sanjana Jon,, 09717321071 (Delhi).
Project Runaway Juror: The Reality Show of the Anand Jon Case.
May 29, 2009 - Los Angeles
The drama of the Anand Jon case was on maximum overdrive as rogue juror Alvin Dymally took the stand. Dymally has been accused of juror misconduct during the trial that would lead to a new trial for the young fashion designer.
In yet another dramatic plot twist to the trial reminiscent of M. Night Shyamalan movies, “a bombshell was dropped Friday by [the defense] presenting an audio tape they say proves a juror spoke with their client's sister during trial, contradicting the juror's sworn testimony given hours earlier.” (AP / Greg Risling) “[Defense attorney Leonard] Levine said he had never been involved in a case with so many twists and turns.”
The hearing Friday brought to light the seriousness of the allegations. Dymally seemed to be playing a game as he testified. He neither fully denied nor really accepted the serious juror misconduct allegations.
“Let me put it this way…I don’t fully remember” was all the juror kept repeating like a broken record. He would go on major tangents elaborating on even the simplest “yes” or “no” response but committing to nothing fully.
Defense attorney Leonard Levine spent 5 grueling hours deciphering Dymally’s studied “rambling”, stripping away his lies under oath with past inconsistent statements. “I know I didn’t have a conversation with her,” Dymally adamantly testified. (AP)
The wait was well worth it as Dymally’s perjury and major inconsistencies left huge holes in his own stories. Finally he had no choice to concede that he had, in fact, initiated the communication with the Anand Jon’s sister, Sanjana.
The shocked courtroom erupted when a surprise taped communication was revealed. Dymally was left speechless and his lawyer repeatedly requested a recess insisting that his client Dymally answer no further questions. The tape, played in court minutes after Dymally had just denied under oath any such communications with Sanjana during the trial, revealed Dymally speaking with Sanjana.
The quality could have been much better, however, Dymally’s non-stop chatter and accent was distinctly obvious. Dymally talked away for 90% of the 4 ½ minute conversation. Sanjana just kept repeating “thank you.” And “thank you very much.” Profusely thanking a juror would not happen after a guilty verdict, which supports Sanjana’s story and clearly contradicts the juror’s.
The tape starts out simple, but powerful: “Um, I got this number in the cafeteria?”
Then the confirmation from the juror: “Oh, yes, hi. How are you?”
Sanjana’s answer is delayed, scared and shaky: “OK. Um, how are you?”
In the sing-song-y cadence of the juror: “I’m doing all right. I’m doing all right?”
In addition, the facts presented at the hearing are undeniable - the subpoenaed phone records for October 27th and November 3rd corroborated the phone calls between the two occurring during the trial, which concluded November 13, 2008. The defense also contends that the length of the taped phone call equals the first call shown on the phone records.
It was also revealed that there was mysterious contact between the DA investigators and Dymally meeting and speaking on the phone more often than the police reports indicate. Was and is Dymally being coached? Although they are supposed to be independent Dymally’s attorney, Pierpont Laidley, was discussing strategy with the prosecution during the hearing.
This mistrial hearing now supports the last hearing that focused on the recusal of the prosecution. The prosecution intentionally thwarted a defense undercover operation; that operation may have eliminated any doubt regarding this juror’s intentions.
There were several misconduct hearings that put the prosecution on the stand and under a microscope. During those hearings the prosecution team each told different stories amounting to someone, if not everyone, was committing perjury. Surprisingly, they got away with it even though Judge Wesley was “troubled by the interception of the juror” (LA Times / Jack Leonard) “…but the remedy”, stated by the judge in court, “will be in the mistrial hearing.”
Also during those hearings the prosecution tried to take the spotlight off of themselves and their misconduct by sidetracking the court with a collection of images of the accusers. As it turns out these images (most of which were available online) were collected by one of the witnesses in a desperate attempt to make everyone and anyone take notice of the racy character of these girls involved in the trial.
This witness, Lauren Boyette, testified as to the role of her old roommate, Holly G, as a ring leader and conspirator in soliciting, pressuring and instigating these girls to file false allegations against Anand Jon. Lauren testified that she and many of the girls that came into the apartment to meet with Holly (as well as those that Holly spoke to on the phone) were promised fame and money for their participation in the conviction. The carrot dangling was her involvement in a TV reality show that Holly is producing and actively shopping around Hollywood.
Holly’s “sugar daddy”, Sal, was also exposed as the money behind the TV project. They met on a website appropriately named “sugardaddyforme.com” (http://www.sugardaddyforme.com/index.php?page=profile&id=263286). Holly G was also exposed as an escort /prostitute trying to establish a “service” using these same girls.
Boyette testified that prosecutor’s lead detective George Elwell offered “deals” to the girls in order to get them to testify against Anand Jon. Referenced was Holly G’s and Lauren Boyette’s arrest and conviction together in Virginia that would be “wiped away”. Boyette continued that she chatted online with Holly G. It was admitted during the chats that Holly committed perjury during the trial with the knowledge of the prosecution. These newly discovered chats were turned over to the court.
Boyette concluded her revealing testimony by stating that she was intimidated by the prosecution not to testify – surprisingly just outside the courtroom. She testified that DDA Young and two burly DA investigators cornered her in the hallway filled with people, including many attorneys. Their hands were on their weapons and Young said “if you testify you will regret it”. Boyette hasn’t been seen in court since this intimidation.
It was revealed that Holly G was a roommate of Anand Jon and admitted to disappearing with Jessie B for 2 ½ hours convincing her to press charges against Anand Jon. Upon their return she suddenly she claimed their relationship was strictly professional, in sharp contrast to the personal “Hi Babe. Miss you. Can’t wait to see you!” email that anticipated her visit and that the consensual sexual contact was forced.
The timing of these charges is suspect as Anand Jon’s Wall Street financing for his jeans line was just kicking in.
“Almost all of these charges were initially rejected and the allegations in the other jurisdictions are simply frivolous with little merit” stated attorney Saji Vettiyil, who worked on the Youngblood case where an innocent man was wrongfully convicted and years later was overturned. Unfortunately Youngblood died in prison before he was exonerated.
In fact, the NY prosecution told the defense that on its own they would not have filed even a single charge. It was simply due to pressure from LA prosecution and their package of seemingly similar charges.
For additional information regarding the Anand Jon case see www.supportanandjon.org or contact Sanjana Jon,
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
ആനന്ദ് ജോണിന് എന്ത് സംഭവിച്ചു? ഇനിഎന്തു സംഭവിക്കണം?.
ആരും കരുതിയില്ല.
2007-ല്‍ ആനന്ദ് അറസ്റ്റ് ചെയ്യപ്പെട്ടു. ആരും കേട്ടാല്‍ അറയ്ക്കുന്ന സ്ത്രീ പീഡനകേസില്‍ ജൈലിലടയ്ക്കപ്പെട്ട ആനന്ദിന്‍റെ ജീവചരിത്രം ഏവര്‍ക്കും അറിയവുന്നതാണ്. ഏറ്റവുമൊടുവില്‍ വന്ന കോടതി വിധിയനുസരിച്ച് അന്‍പത്തിഒമ്പത് വര്‍ഷത്തെ ജയില്‍ വാസമാണ് ആനന്ദിനനുഭവിക്കേണ്ടത്.
ഇപ്പോള്‍ ആനന്ദിന് വയസ് മുപ്പത്തിയന്‍ച്ചു. അന്‍പത്തിഒന്‍പതു വര്‍ഷം കഴിഞ്ഞ് പുറത്തിറങ്ങുമ്പോള്‍ ആനന്ദിന് തോണ്ണൂറ്റിനാല് വയസുണ്ടാകും. ആ പ്രായം വരെ ജീവിക്കുന്നവര്‍ വളരെയധികം ഉണ്ടാവില്ല ഒരു പക്ഷേ ജീവനോടെ ആനന്ദ് പുറത്തിറങ്ങരുതെന്ന് ആരൊക്കയോ ആഗ്രഹിക്കുന്നതുപോലെ തോന്നുന്നു. ഫാഷന്‍ ഡിസൈനിങ്ങില്‍ ലോകത്ത് ഒന്നാം സ്ഥാനത്തേക്ക് കുതിച്ചുയരുന്നതിനിടയിലാണ്‌ ആനന്ദിന് ഈ അധോഗതി ഉണ്ടായതു. ഇന്ത്യയുടെ അഭിമാനമായി തീരേണ്ട ചെറുപ്പകാരന്‍ ഇന്ന് ഇന്ത്യയുടെ അപമാനമായി പലരും കരുതുന്നു.
ഗാനഗന്ധര്‍വ്വന്‍ യേശുദാസിന്‍റെ ഭാര്യസഹോദരി പുത്രനാണ് ആനന്ദ് ജോണ്‍. എന്നാല്‍ യേശുദാസടക്കം അടുത്ത ബന്ധുക്കള്‍
പോലും ഈ കേസില്‍ ഇടപെടാന്‍ ത്ല്പര്യപെടുന്നില്ല. ആനന്ദിനുവേണ്ടി വാദിക്കുവാന്‍ അമ്മ ശശി അബ്രഹാമും
സഹോദരി സജ്ജനാജോണും മാത്രം. നിര്‍ഭാഗ്യവശാല്‍ സജ്ജനാജോണിനും ഈയിടെ കോടതിയല്ക് ഷ്യ കേസില്‍ പിഴശിക്ഷ ലഭിച്ചു.
ലോകമനസാക്ഷി ഉണരേണ്ട സന്ദര്‍ഭമാണിത്. കോടതിയില്‍ വിചാരണയക്ക് വന്ന ആരോപണങളെല്ലാം ആനന്ദ്
ചെയ്തതാണെന്ന്‌ വിശസിക്കാന്‍ അല്‍പ്പം പ്രയാസമുണ്ട്. കുറെയൊക്കെ തെറ്റുകള്‍ ആനന്ദ് ചെയ്തിരിക്കാം. കുറെയൊക്കെ ആരൊക്കെയോ എന്തിനൊക്കെയോ വേണ്ടി കുട്ടിചേര്‍ത്തതുമാകം. എന്തായാലും അന്‍പത്തിഒന്‍പതു വര്‍ഷം വളരെ കടന്ന കൈയായിപോയി.
എവിടെയായിരുന്നാലും ജയില്‍ ജീവിതം ബന്ധനാവസ്ഥ തന്നെയാണ്. ഇന്ത്യയിലായാലും യുറോപ്പിലയാലും അമേരിക്കയിലായാലും തുറുങ്കിലെ ജീവിതം ക്ലേശകരം തന്നെ. ജയിലില്‍ നിന്നും പുറത്തിറങ്ങുന്നവരില്‍ നിന്നും കേട്ട കഥകള്‍
സംഭ്രമംമുണ്ടാക്കുന്നവയാണ്. മാത്രമല്ല, രണ്ടു വര്‍ഷത്തിലധികം ജയിലില്‍ കഴിജ്ജതുതനെ ചെയ്തത തെറ്റിന്‍റ്റെ
പ്രായശ്ചിത്തമായി നമ്മുക്ക് കരുതാം.
ആനന്ദിനെ പിന്തുണച്ചുകൊണ്ടോ ന്യായീകരിച്ചുകൊണ്ടോ കോടതിയെ സമീപിച്ചതുകൊണ്ടോ ഫലമുണ്ടായെന്ന് വരികയില്ല.എന്നാല്‍ കുറ്റം ഏറ്റുപറയുന്നതും ബുദ്ധിപരമായ കാര്യമല്ല. അമേരിക്കയിലെ സ്വാധീനശക്തിയുള്ള സമുഹമെന്ന നിലയില്‍ മലയാളികളായ നമ്മുക്കൊത്ത് ചേര്‍ന്ന് എന്തെങ്കിലും ചെയ്യാന്‍ സാധിച്ചേക്കും.
ഒരു സാധിയത ഞാന്‍ കാണുന്നത് ആനന്ദിനെ ഇന്ത്യയിലേക്ക്‌ ഡിപോര്‍ട്ട്‌ ചെയ്യാന്‍ ആവശ്യപ്പെടുക എന്നതാണ്. ഇന്ത്യയില്‍ സ്വതത്രജീവിതം അനുവദിക്കാന്‍ ഇന്ത്യഗവണ്‍മെന്‍റ്റും തയ്യാറാകണം. അതിനോട് യോജിപ്പില്ലങ്കില്‍ ചുരുങ്ങിയ
കാലം ജയിലില്‍ അടച്ചതിനുശേഷം സ്വതത്രനാക്കിയാലും തെറ്റില്ല .
അങ്ങനെ ഇന്ത്യയില്‍ തിരിച്ചെത്തുന്ന ആനന്ദിന് ഇന്ത്യയോട്‌ കടപ്പാടുണ്ടാകണം. ഇന്ത്യന്‍ വേഷങ്ങളില്‍ കാലഘട്ടത്തിനനുസരിച്ചുള്ള പരിഷ്ക്കാരങള്‍ വരുത്തി ലോക വിപണി പിടിച്ചടക്കാന്‍ ആനന്ദിന് നമ്മുക്കവസരം നല്കാം.അതിനായി ആനന്ദിന്‍റെ സ്വാതന്ത്രിയപ്രാപ്തിക്കായ് ഒരു കൊടിക്കീ ഴില്‍ അണിനിരക്കാം. ഫൊക്കാന, ഫോമ, വേള്‍ഡ്മലയാളി കൌണ്‍സില്‍ ഇന്ത്യപ്രസ്‌ക്ലബ്‌ എന്നി പടുകൂറ്റെന്‍ സംഘടനകള്‍ അഭിപ്രായവ്യത്യാസം മറന്ന്‌ ഒന്നിച്ചു പ്രവര്‍ത്തിക്കാന്‍ ലഭിക്കുന്ന അസുലഭ സന്ദര്‍ഭങ്ങളിലൊന്നാണിത്. അതിനായി പ്രാര്‍ത്ഥനയുടെ പിന്‍ബെലത്തില്‍ നമ്മുക്കൊന്നിച്ചു പ്രവര്‍ത്തിക്കാം.
വാര്‍ത്ത: ജോസ് പിന്‍റ്റോ സ്ടീഫെന്‍
Friday, February 5, 2010
ASSOCIATE SECRETARY AMERICA REGION
====================================
Based on the recommendation of Mr. Chrly Angadicheril, President, America Region, and using the authority vested in me, I hereby announce the appointment of Mr. Anoop Thomas as the Associate Secretary, America Region. effective Feb. 1, 2010.
He will immediately step in to fill up the void, and take up challenging assignments to make WMC 2010 a great success.
Anoop has been working with the WMC Leadership since a few months in connection with our WMC 2010 Convention activities, and he has proved his capability to work diligently and with a great deal of commitment. He is well organized apart from being an expert on computer science, media and digitization.
You may review his bio data attached, and you will feel proud of this appointment, as Charley and I feel, at this moment.
Kindly join me in welcoming Anoop Thomas on board, and congratulating him on his decision to join us as a Volunteer.
He is a "Youth Leader" and I see great future in him with WMC. Please extend him your glad hand of cooperation.
With regards and best wishes to all my colleagues at WMC,
Varghese Thekkekkekara
Chairman
America Region
WORLD MALAYALEE COUNCIL
Based on the recommendation of Mr. Chrly Angadicheril, President, America Region, and using the authority vested in me, I hereby announce the appointment of Mr. Anoop Thomas as the Associate Secretary, America Region. effective Feb. 1, 2010.
He will immediately step in to fill up the void, and take up challenging assignments to make WMC 2010 a great success.
Anoop has been working with the WMC Leadership since a few months in connection with our WMC 2010 Convention activities, and he has proved his capability to work diligently and with a great deal of commitment. He is well organized apart from being an expert on computer science, media and digitization.
You may review his bio data attached, and you will feel proud of this appointment, as Charley and I feel, at this moment.
Kindly join me in welcoming Anoop Thomas on board, and congratulating him on his decision to join us as a Volunteer.
He is a "Youth Leader" and I see great future in him with WMC. Please extend him your glad hand of cooperation.
With regards and best wishes to all my colleagues at WMC,
Varghese Thekkekkekara
Chairman
America Region
WORLD MALAYALEE COUNCIL
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
വെല്‍ക്കം to പ്രവാസി ന്യൂസ്‌
We welcome you to our new online publication. You can send us your Stories, Poems, Articles, Photos and Videos. We also request you to visit this site often as you can. Please don't forget to invite your friends and family members to visit this site. We assure you quality materials. We just started this blog as a beginning and we are going to make it a major online publication. So it is just a starting and we believe with your help and support it will turn into something great. We can help and motivate eachother. Today's world we need people with creative ideas and a network of people who wants to inspire themself and others. That is our aim and goal behind this initiative. So let us come together in the same flatform and we will achieve and promote universal brotherhood and friendship.You can send your works in English or in Malayalam. We also invite your ideas and suggestions. Feel free to drop few lines and we will reply to you as soon as we can. Once again welcome to Pravasi News.